Blog

Transform your gym
in 5 minutes a day.

Get the no-BS morning newsletter read by 30,000 gym owners.

A rubber hex dumbbell sits on the rubber floor of a microgym with golden sunlight streaming in through windows to the left.

How to Say "No" to Discounts

By now, you already know this: Discounts kill businesses. I made the case in “Why We Don’t Have Sales.” But there are two parts to change: The first is making the decision to change, and the second is actually making the change. In other words, knowing what to do is half the battle (or less). Taking action is really all that matters. To help you act, I’ll supply the easiest ways to say “no” when someone asks for a discount. 1. “We don’t have discounts.” This is my go-to. Because I don’t have discounts for anyone, it’s simplest for me to say that discounts don’t exist. This has solved our “discount” problem for over six years. 2. When someone else is giving discounts “We don’t play those games.” Because the nature of discounts is subjective (it requires a human “decision” instead of an automated process), it’s always easy to cast a shadow of doubt on the intent on the discounter. I saw this in action when I was selling high-end fitness equipment. We were always in a losing price battle against Sears and other department stores that ran frequent “sales” on treadmills. So when someone asked us to match a price or when we’d have a 40 percent off sale, we’d say, “We don’t play those games.” It worked: You could see a visible shift in the purchaser as he or she became suspicious of the chains offering the discount. It helped that one of the department stores was sued for advertising a regular price on tires that it never actually charged—they were always on sale. I occasionally brought that up. 3. When someone asks for a specific discount Members of some service groups receive discounts from other businesses, so they’re inclined to ask for them everywhere. Here’s your response: “We treat all our service professionals equally well because we know our service is critical for your safety.” The service ...
Read More →

Why We Buy The iPhone X, But Complain About The Price of CrossFit

Zig Ziglar was a traveling salesman in the 1940s. He did door-to-door sales for decades, eventually becoming a popular sales coach and public speaker. He recounted this tale in his book, “Ziglar on Selling”.   Ziglar was in a family’s living room–the studio for his art–pitching cookware. The family desperately needed cookware; there were many of them, and mama spent much of the day over a hot stove, reusing the same pot. Ziglar spent two hours trying to convince them that new cookware would save mama a lot of time cooking and even more time cleaning. But the family–mama included–kept repeating, “no money, too expensive, can’t afford it.”   As he was packing his samples into his suitcase, mama spied a catalogue for fine china in Ziglar’s bag. She asked if he sold fine china, and he said, “Yes ma’am, we sell the finest china in the world!”   She and the family made a huge order for fine china–one of Ziglar’s biggest sales–in the middle of a depression. I’ll let Zig take it from here:   “Less than thirty minutes later, I left that household with an order worth substantially more than the entire set of cookware. Now think with me. If she couldn’t afford the set of cookware she so desperately needed, how could she afford the china she didn’t need? The answer is, she couldn’t afford a set of cookware she didn’t want, but she could afford a set of fine china she did want. Here is the key point: People buy what they want when they want it more than the money it costs.”   We are not rational beings, but emotional ones.   We don’t weigh purchase decisions logically (“I can cut my $4 daily coffee budget and be able to afford $120 per month at the gym.”) Instead, we approach every purchase decision from an emotional perspective first. Then we rationalize that decision.   ...
Read More →
A sweeping red arrow arcs upward along an American dollar bill that has been chopped up to look like a bar graph.

Why You'll Never Need 300 Members

 A few months ago, I was speaking in Montreal, Quebec. It was a split seminar: other speakers took Saturday’s presentation, and I followed on Sunday. We have very different ideas on business, so I was glad to go second. During the first day, one attendee volunteered that he wanted to earn $100,000 per year (net). He shared his rates (which were low, but not grievously so). The speaker did some quick math and told him, “You need 374 members. Go get them.” Never mind additional revenue streams. Forget about hiring other coaches to help with the workload. For 374 members, this guy could buy himself a job. 374 recurring memberships is a high number to reach (where will they all fit? How many bars will you need? How will you coach that many people?) There are a handful of gyms doing it, but next to none have a decent profit margin (33% or above). I’ve written about all of these problems at length. The simple number “374” hides a deadly trap, though. What the speaker meant was that the owner needed to get and keep 374 members, averaging that number forever, to make a good living as a gym owner. We track retention data through surveys, monthly accountability calls and our Gym Checkup. I first wrote about retention data in the CrossFit Journal in 2009. This is the number we watch most closely, because in the service industry, client acquisition is very time-expensive. Let’s say you have a 95% monthly retention rate. If you have a small gym of 50 members, you’re probably slightly higher. But as your gym grows, you have weaker connections to each member. That’s one reason retention rates tend to drop in larger gyms. 95% monthly retention in gyms over 300 members is very, very rare. People quit because they don’t like it; they quit because they don’t like you; they quit because they move. Even at a 95% retention rate, a gym with ...
Read More →
A look through a pair of black-framed glasses as they focus on a forest.

How To Optimize Your Day

Work expands to fill the space you give it. As an entrepreneur, it’s easy to spend a day being “busy” but accomplishing little. Small tasks are always present to fill your time; and rabbit-holes like chatting up visitors and Facebook groups can drag you in for hours. Just like budgeting your money, budgeting your time can help you optimize your efforts. Instead of adding more things to your place in the Incubator, you will succeed because we focus your attention and limit your tasks. Here’s a quick way to optimize your time. First, you’re going to create two windows for uninterrupted work. The first work window is for checklists; the second is for creativity. First window: FOCUS Use this time for uninterrupted single-tasking. Pull up your checklist for the day. Find the simplest task to perform, and work it through to completion. Then find the next-simplest, and work it all the way through. This is single-tasking. But it’s also using a cognitive tendency called Gap Theory to get you some momentum and draw you into the “flow state”, where you work at your optimum focused pace. During your Focus window, you need to be in a place with a door that closes; you need to turn off your phone and desktop notifications. If you work better to music, play some (I work best in complete silence.) As you work through your list, cross completed tasks off and add them to your “done” list. At the end of your Focus window, you’ll want to see what you’ve accomplished. That’s important. If you have trouble getting started, use the Hemingway hack: start with something that’s almost done already. Hemingway would stop writing mid sentence at the end of each day so the next morning he could simply finish the sentence and then be in flow state. The goal of your Focus window is to SHIP. Read more by Seth Godin here. Second ...
Read More →

Episode 87: Justin Bergh, GM of the CrossFit Games

 
Read More →

Incremental vs Exponential Growth

When Dan Martell was on TwoBrain Radio, he said:   “It’s easier to 10x your business than to 2x your business.”   And a lot of people thought he meant, “Aim for the moon and you’ll land in the stars” or something like that–just a basic “set your sights higher” message.   Those people are wrong. Dan was talking about the difference between Incremental and Exponential Growth.   When you sell a service, it’s not enough to be better; you have to be different.   You need to have a monopoly on your service. You need to be the only gym in town doing X.   As Peter Thiel hammered again and again in “Zero to One,” simply being better at something means incremental change. It’s incremental because most clients won’t change gyms for incremental change; most non-clients won’t be able to tell the difference. This is what starts price wars: when clients and future clients can’t see a difference that justifies a higher price, they’ll go with the lowest-priced option.   Now, you’re probably thinking, “Well, I’m way better than the next guy. Why does ANYONE go to his gym instead of mine?” And the answer is: the difference is mostly in your head. It’s not obvious to the client OR the future client. Sorry. You see apples to oranges: they see Macintosh and Braeburn.   Can you double your revenue by being incrementally better–by having cleaner bathrooms, better coaches and classes that start right on time? Yes. But you can’t 10x your revenue that way.   To 10x your revenue, you need something that no one else is selling. This removes price pressure, because you’re no longer competing with anyone.   I don’t sell gym access because other gyms can sell it for $19 per month. I sell coaching, because they can’t.   I don’t just sell group classes, because the spin studio on the next block does ...
Read More →